Friday, 21 October 2016

IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL LEGISLATION

IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL LEGISLATION:
                                     Legislation is important to protect the human rights of society and to improve the socio-economic conditions of the society. Social legislation is a tool of social work and its importance can be seen in these points,   1. the basis of certain social welfare institutions the social worker must be aware of it otherwise he will not be able to function properly.    2. for guidance and counselling    3.for the referral of clients in the appropriate agencies    4. it helps the government to implement social policy    5. the laws are the codified forms of social norms
Legislation is important for several reasons, including setting standards and controls to govern the actions of people and groups in the public and private spheres. Legislation is sometimes referred to as statutory law, and it is law that has been put into place by the actions of a legislature or governing body. Legislation is valuable to setting societal standards and norms at all levels of government, including the local, state and national level.
Legislation at all levels can serve several purposes. It is used to regulate activities, authorize certain actions, supply resources such as funding, implement sanctions and permit or deny certain activities. For an issue to be considered for passage or denial in legislation, the item must first be proposed by a member of the legislature, such as a member of Congress or a judge. The item is then discussed among other members of the legislature, who decide whether to put the item up for consideration in passing legislation.
Items may be approved for further consideration or denied. If approved, they are often changed or amended in successive legislative sessions before passing. Legislation is one of three primary functions of government; legislators create legislation, which is then interpreted by individuals in the judicial branch and set into law through the executive branch.

Monday, 17 October 2016

Social Work Legislation and Practice

“Social work and the law” refers to the interface between the practice of social work and the legal system, including statutory law, case law, legal institutions (courts, prisons, etc.), and legal professionals (attorneys, judges, paralegals, forensic experts, and alternative dispute resolution professionals). Law plays a number of important roles in the practice of social work. First, from an ecological perspective, the legal system is a vital part of a client’s social environment. Many social work clients are involved in legal systems, such as child protection, criminal justice, or mental health. Social workers need to be aware of the laws that regulate each system in order to help clients navigate their way through these systems more effectively, and to be able to advocate for law reform to improve the goodness of fit between clients and their socio-legal environments. Laws also govern many relationships of interest to social work clients, including landlord/tenant, employer/employee, physician/patient, vendor/purchaser, spouse/spouse, and parent/child relationships. Thus, knowledge of the law should provide practitioners with a practical understanding of their clients’ rights and responsibilities in a broad range of social relationships. Second, hospitals, schools, social assistance, correctional institutions, mental health facilities, and other social agencies are regulated by organization-specific laws. Organization-specific laws may dictate who is eligible for services, standards for record keeping, confidentiality, and other client rights. Social workers need to understand these laws in order to ensure that their agencies comply with the laws, and to be able to advocate for changes in the law to promote greater social and economic justice. Third, the profession of social work itself is regulated by various laws. Most states have licensing or accreditation laws that regulate the practice of social work, including who may practice and what standards of practice are legally enforceable. Social workers should also be aware of malpractice (tort) laws that identify when a social worker may be legally responsible for causing harm to a client if they perform their professional duties in a manner that falls below a reasonable standard of care. Finally, some social workers practice in forensic settings, providing investigations, evaluation, expert testimony, and treatment for clients involved in court or other legal systems. Such settings include probation, parole, prison, child custody evaluation, and involuntary committal to mental health institutions.

Introductory Works

The resources listed here provide overall introductions to social work and the law, as well as to law and the legal system more generally. For basic overviews and explanations of legal terms, some of the older materials may be sufficient. For specific laws and how they apply in specific circumstances, readers should refer to the most current sources. Madden 2003 and Alexander 2003 provide two of the more recent and comprehensive introductions to social work and the law. Stein 2004 offers one of the most accessible introductions to the legal system and the philosophy of law.

4 Why do social workers need to know about the law?

From our discussion of social work and the meaning of law you will already have some answers to this question. We will now bring them together and relate them to wider debates about the content of the social work curriculum.
We have seen that there are few right answers in social work. However, if practitioners do not know where they stand legally they cannot begin to do their job properly because they will not be able to give appropriate advice and support to service users. They will also not be able to work effectively if they are unaware of the legal requirements and options in a given situation and the different consequences attached to pursuing each of those options. Some legislation places direct statutory responsibilities on social workers while in other areas, such as housing and welfare benefits, the responsibility is more one of advocacy and advice.
It is also important to recognise that social workers are not lawyers. They need to know when to call on professional legal opinion to guide their own actions and when to advise service users and others to seek expert advice.
Since the mid 1980s there has been much discussion and debate about the nature and quality of legal knowledge needed by social workers (see SCIE, 2005). Historically, social work education programmes tended to regard law as a discrete body of knowledge imported from another professional discipline without first being distilled through the value base of social work practice. Social workers were therefore encouraged to believe that they should have a fairly detailed knowledge of the legal content of their work, without necessarily having an understanding of the context of legal rules. They were encouraged to absorb legal facts in the abstract, which contributed to the view that the law was difficult to understand and not always relevant. In part this debate had been fuelled by the inquiry reports into child abuse scandals where the criticism of social workers had taken one of two forms: either they were viewed as having an inadequate knowledge of the statutory powers available to them (e.g. Blom-Cooper, 1985) or they were criticised for having adopted a heavy-handed approach and putting their statutory powers before other social work considerations (e.g. Butler-Sloss, 1988; Clyde, 1992).
So while the law provides the mandate for practice, in the sense that it vests social workers with legal powers and duties to take appropriate professional action, it is also the case that the law does not automatically provide the answer or solutions to practice dilemmas. Thus the relevant legal rules do not, by themselves, provide a clear, consistent and comprehensive guide to practice. The missing ingredient is a commitment to good or ‘ethical’ practice. An ethical approach is one where the social work relationship with the legal framework takes account of social work skills and values. The existence of the legal framework does not mean that there is no need to exercise professional judgement and discretion. Such judgement is key and must be informed by the wider knowledge base, values and skills of social work practice (Stevenson, 1988).
Braye and Preston-Shoot describe social work law as being comprised of three distinct but interrelated strands:
Legal powers and duties which provide social workers with a mandate to practise; ethical and professional values which guide practice, some of which are incorporated into statutory provisions; and aspects of administrative law, such as judicial review, which scrutinize the actions of organisations within which social work is predominantly located.
(Braye and Preston-Shoot, 1997)
These elements are reflected in the Standards in Social Work Education (SiSWE) requirements for the social work degree in Scotland, which emphasise the importance of law in social work education and the ethical context of social work practice (Scottish Executive, 2003b). The specific professional requirements in relation to law are outlined in Box 4, but these are integrated into a broader educational framework which places them within guiding ethical principles and accepted codes of professional conduct.

Box 4: Extracts from the social work degree framework

Students are expected to understand:
  • legal bases for intervention;
  • social workers' roles as statutory agents with duties and responsibilities to protect the public and uphold the law;
  • the concepts of rights, responsibility, freedom, authority and power associated with the practice of social workers as moral and statutory agents;
  • up-to-date legislation defining the rights of people, especially measures designed to tackle all forms of discrimination;
  • the significance of legislative and legal frameworks, service standards, practice guidelines and codes of practice;
  • the nature of legal authority;
  • the application of legislation in practice;
  • statutory responsibility and conflicts between statute, policy and practice;
  • knowledge of equal opportunities and anti-discriminatory legislation and policy;
  • the relationship between agency policies, legal requirements, ethical principles and professional boundaries in shaping the nature of services;
  • legal requirements relating to data protection and the rights of citizens to have access to information held about them.
The aim of the SiSWE requirements is to ensure the qualification of competent practitioners who, according to Preston-Shoot (2000), should be ‘confident, credible, critical and creative’:
  • confident to challenge inappropriate interpretations or use of the legal rules
  • credible when presenting the rationale for their decision making
  • critical to make their professional practice and the legal rules accessible to those with whom they work, to assess the impact of policies on people's lives and to navigate through questions of ethics, rights and needs
  • creative in order to exploit the opportunities that the legal rules present and to manage the practice dilemmas and conflicting imperatives that the interface between law and social work practice generates.
(SCIE, 2005, pp. 17–18)
A study of law for social workers, therefore, involves much more than knowing the legislation. In order to feel competent and confident in their engagement with service users, social workers need to understand the link between law and practice, between legal values and social work values. We have seen that acquiring these skills can also be of benefit to service users, who may be empowered by knowledge of law and a wider appreciation of the social work practice context.

The law and social work practice

Why Do Social Workers Need To Know The Law?

“I want to be a social worker, not a lawyer” (Robert Johns p.1)
The aim of this assignment is to consider the importance of law for social workers and discuss the professional skills and values which underpin social work practice in England and Wales today.
I will firstly look at how law frames social work practice
The relationship between the law and social work practice is complex. Although an in-depth understanding of how the law affects every day social work practice is essential, it also involves much more than just learning the legal rules. “Constant reflection and critical analysis of your own values and practice of social work are required to be an effective practitioner” (block 1 p130).
However, Jeremy Roche argues that although the law provides a framework it cannot tell social workers what to do in every circumstance. The law cannot always resolve the dilemmas and tensions that face social workers everyday. “Above all, the law cannot substitute for sound professional practice”

How The Law Is Made

The Law provides a framework for practice which grants the social worker with powers to take appropriate action. A starting point for understanding the legal framework is Statute law which is one of the main sources of law and is contained in an Act of Parliament. The Children Act 1989 is an example of statute law.
The language of statutes can sometimes appear confusing - for example the meaning of ‘significant harm' is not described in detail in the Children Act 1989 and can therefore be open to interpretation. A social worker will therefore have to provide evidence that the child is likely to suffer from significant harm and such decisions will be made jointly with legal advisers and managers (block 1 p.51)
Case law is the second source of law which is developed by the courts from judgments made on cases brought before them (block 1 p.51). An example of case law that has an impact on society is the case of Diane Pretty who had a terminal illness causing a physical disability and she wished to have the right to choose when to die with the help of her husband. Diane's argument was that “the right to life contained within Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) also implied a right to die” (block 1 p.52). However, her application was rejected by the court who stated that Article 2 was not concerned with the quality of life. (block 1 p.52.
Although the language of statutes can be difficult to understand, there are two words which will help social workers to interpret statutes and they are ‘duties' and ‘power'.
Legislation provides social workers with certain powers as well as duties that social workers are legally bound to fulfil. An example of this is shown in the case study of Masie when her need for a service requires as assessment as decisions will be influenced by not only the social worker's commitment to values and best practice but by the legal duties and powers. However, it can be frustrating when it is clear that a service is needed for a service user but there is insufficient money to provide that particular resource.
A further example of the importance for social workers to have a thorough knowledge of the law in order that they can make decisions on appropriate legislation is shown in the case study of the Clarke family (p 82 of block 1 book) where the social worker attends the family home on an arranged visit and finds Emily (mother) under the influence of alcohol while the children were playing with cutlery in the kitchen. This is clearly an issue of child protection as the children are likely to suffer significant harm if they remain in the care of their mother. It therefore makes it a duty for the local authority to investigate and provide services as well as having the power to protect the children.

How The Law Underpins Social Work Practice:

The law which underpins social work practice was radically redrawn in the 1980's following a series of scandals - for example the events in Cleveland where social workers were accused of an over-readiness of taking children into care and the fact that the parents felt totally undermined and were not afforded proper rights to present their views. Interestingly the Cleveland Report also acknowledged the dilemma of child protection work “namely that social workers are “damned if they do, and damned if they don't” (Robert Johns p.10)
As a consequence of the events in Cleveland, many key principles such as the accountability of social workers to the law are now enshrined in the Children Act 1989, and according to Robert Johns, social workers welcomed the clarity this would have (word better)

Values & Principles

Throughout my reading and my experience as a social work student I have learnt that before we can even think about working anti-oppressively within the law we need to look at our own experiences. Everyone has values and principles which shape our behaviour and perceptions of the world and it therefore important that social workers reflect on their values as their decisions will have a direct affect on the services they provide when practicing. (p126 block 1)
Although social work values underpin decision making when working with service users, there are also values embedded in legislation which support social work values. However, there maybe areas of conflict or tension between legal values and social work values, particularly when a service user is deemed to be entitled to certain community services look at page 129 and expand………………….
There are also areas of the law that social workers may find difficult to address, for example, the Diane Petty case which I discussed earlier, where a commitment to social work values could mean respecting Diane's wishes.
In order to demonstrate my own professional development as a social work student, I will briefly look at how the legislation underpins the assessment of children in need and discuss the importance social work values while completing an assessment.
A child in need assessment should provide a clear understanding of the child's needs and is based on the provision of the Children Act 1989 and 2004, the principle that underpins the Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families (Department of Health, et al 2000), Working Together (Department of Health, 1991), and Every Child Matters which provides the legislative foundation on which policy and guidance has been built to inform social work practice in assessment.
The social worker's knowledge of the law and service provisions can be critical in empowering service users (Block 1 p20). It is essential for the social worker to work in a way that is both anti-oppressive and which recognises cultural perspectives. Anti-oppressive practice means “recognising power imbalances and working towards the promotion of change to redress the balance of power”. (Dalrymple and Burke 2003, p.15).
Social workers have to make decisions in their everyday practice based on their own values and good practice is about involving service users through all stages of the assessment, inviting them to meetings, informing them of their rights and options as well as working in a way that is accountable (Thompson 2006). This would also support social work value D “Value, recognise and respect the diversity, expertise and experience of individuals, families, carers, groups and communities” (GSCC, 2002).
It was interesting to note that Jane Aldgate (in Law and Social work book) looks at both the strengths and weaknesses of the assessment framework and although acknowledges that the shared language between professionals is undoubtedly a strength, Calder and Hackett, 2003 (in law in social work) criticise that the omission of risk as a separate category can lead to professionals underestimating risks when completing an assessment.

Conclusion

The law provides a framework to guide and assist social workers in making crucial decisions and preventing anti-discriminatory practice as well as providing a framework of legal rights for service users. Principles of social justice and human rights are fundamental to social work and without an in-depth understanding of the law and how it affects social work practice, it would be impossible to practice effectively.
Throughout my experience as a social work student together with my research and reading for this assignment it has become clear that in order to comply with the General Social Care Council Codes of Practice (2002) social workers must view the law as an integral part of their role.


Thursday, 13 October 2016

Link between social justice and social legislation

SOCIAL JUSTICE
                        Social justice is a justice that follows the principle that all individuals and groups are entitled to fair and impartial treatment. Social justice attempts to prevent human rights abuses it is based on notion of all equality and equal opportunity in society. It focuses on the full and equal participation of all citizens in economic, social and political aspect of the nation. Social justice can also referred to advantages and disadvantages distribution in the society
The concept of social Justice
Social Justice is a living concept and gives substance to the rule of law and meaning and significance to the ideal of a welfare State. The Indian constitution is an illustration of the forces at work in socio-economic Jurisprudence. It sets out the Directive principles of State Policy fundamental to the governance of the country and spells  out a social order in which Justice, Social, economic and political, shall inform all the Institutions of National life. Social Justice takes within its sweep the objective of           removing all inequalities and affording equal opportunities to all citizens in social affairs as well as economic activities. The term "Justice without doubt means Justice to the deprived and weaker sections of society bringing an egalitarian order under which opportunities are afforded to the weaker
Social Justice under the Constitution of India
Vast social revolution is taking place in the judicial   process, the law is fast changing and  the problems of the poor are coming to the forefront. The Court has to innovate new methods and device new strategies for providing access to justice to large masses of the people, Who are denied their basic human rights and to whom freedom and liberty has no meaning. Articles 38 of the Constitution of India are the supreme law envisages social justice as its arch to ensure  life to be meaningful   and livable with human dignity. The  concept of social justice which the Constitution of India engrafted, concept of            diverse principles essential for orderly growth and development of personality of every citizen.          Social  justice' is thus  an integral part of justice in a generic sense.   Justice is genus, of which social justice is one of its        species.           

Link between social legislation and social justice                                 
When unequal distribution of wealth exists in a society or when social justice is denied to
certain sections of the people, laws are enacted to bring about equilibrium. These laws
may be designated under “social legislation”. Social legislation tries to remove
inequalities and to benefit the whole community rather than a few individuals. It adjusts
supplements and sometime replaces the existing legal system. In other words, in
addition to ameliorating the social conditions of people, it bridges the gulf that exists
between the existing law at the requirements of the society at a given time.Social legislation, in this sense has a special significance. It is different from ordinary types of legislation in as much as it reflects, the legislative policy of establishing social justice on humanistic and egalitarian principles. Social legislation, therefore, aims at establishing social equality in society. The need of society is adjusted and those who are responsible for creating imbalances or inequalities in society are prevented from doing so. It is however, necessary that all social legislation must be accompanied by “social preparedness” - by effective propaganda to educate the people about its objects and to convince them of the ultimate utility of a particular legislative measure aimed at promoting the common good and fostering the common welfare. It is only then that the law can give direction, form and continuity to social change.
The constitutional provisions aim at bringing about social justice.
Ø  The glaring inequality of different types more particularly based on sex and caste prevailed in Indian society until the pre-independence days, despite continuous efforts by the state, reformers and missionaries to control and eradicate them.
Ø  The Constitution gives the right to all persons to profess freely, practice and propagate religion subject to public order
Ø  the practice of untouchability has been outlawed by Article 17 of the Constitution and by the Untouchability Offences Act, 1955 enacted in pursuance of Article 17
Ø  Article 39A Equal justice and free legal         aid- The concept of legal aid is rightly stated to be the spirit of equality And its movement is dedicated and devoted to the philosophy of equal justice to the indigent. Equal justice is a fair treatment within the purview of judicial process. Equal justice is, therefore, corrective of inequalities which cause social imbalance, without which justice in society cannot be propounded in reality.

Social justice through the welfare legislation.
The welfare legislations enacted during the post-independence era. The establishment of Human Rights Commission, Women's Commission, Family Courts, Industrial tribunals, Administrative Tribunals, Ombudsman, Panchayati Raj, and Lok Adalats etc are only a few illustrations to suggest that the sole objective is to make justice available to a common man and ameliorate the sufferings of masses including women, children and other neglected and weaker sections of the society. The laws relating to consumers protection, dowry prohibition, abolition of bonded labour, control of environmental pollution etc. have been enacted to provide social justice.
The Civil Rights Act, 1955
The immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956
The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958
The Equal Remuneration Act, 1976
The Family Courts Act, 1984
The Child Labour (Prohibition& Regulation) Act, 1986
The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987
The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 200
The SC&ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
The Child Marriage Restraint (Amendment) Act,      1978
The National Commission for Women Act, 1990
The Public Liability Insurance Rights Act, 1991
The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993
Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1994
The (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996
These socio-economic measures are meant to protect the dignity of human personality and to ensure prosperity of people as also the State
Provisions under Directive principles of state policy bring social justice
Ø  Article 39(d) speaks of equal pay  for  equal  work for both men and women
Ø  Article 39(e) speaks of health and strength of workers, men and women and the measures to prevent exploitation of children.
Ø  Article 39(f) directs that children be given opportunity and facilities to develop in a healthy manner and in conditions of   freedom and dignity)
Role of social policies and schemes to provide social justice.
The government has made a number of schemes and social policies.
Ø  National old age pension (NOAP)
Ø  Mid-day meals schemes (MDMS)
Ø  Annapurna yojana4 National family benefits schemes. (NFBS)
Ø   Sampurna gramin rozgar yojana
Ø  Mahatma Gandhi National rural employment guarantee act 2005 (MNREGA)
Ø   Indira Gandhi awas yojana (IAY)
Ø  Swarn jayanti gram swarozgar yojana (SGSY)
Ø   Serve shikshaabhiyan
Ø  Right of children to free and compulsory education (2009)
Ø  National rural health mission 2005
Ø   Kanshi rams awas yojana



Link between social security and social legislation



SOCIAL LEGISLATION
 Laws that seek to promote the common good, generally by protecting and assisting the weaker members of society, are considered to be social legislation. Such legislation includes laws assisting the unemployed, the infirm, the disabled, and the elderly. The social welfare system consists of hundreds of state and federal programs of two general types. Some programs, including Social Security, Medicare, unemployment insurance, and Workers' Compensation, are called social insurance programs because they are designed to protect citizens against hardship due to old age, unemployment, or injury. Because people receiving benefits from these programs generally have contributed toward their benefits by paying payroll taxes during the years that they worked, these social insurance programs are usually thought of as earned rewards for work. Programs of a second type, often cumulatively called the Welfare System, provide government assistance to those already poor. These social programs have maximum income requirements and include Aid to Families with Dependent Children, the Food Stamp Program, Medicaid, and Supplemental Security Insurance.
Although the United States has had social welfare legislation since colonial times, its nature and extent has changed over the years. For much of U.S. history, Americans preferred to rely on the marketplace to distribute goods and services equitably among the population. In cases where the market clearly failed to provide for categories of people such as widows, orphans, or the elderly, families were expected to take responsibility for the care of their members. When family members lacked the ability to do so, private, religious, or charitable organizations often played that role. Help from the town, county, or local government was rarely provided, and even then only in those cases where the need arose due to conditions beyond the individual's control, such as sickness, old age, mental incapacity, or widowhood. Social security is a concept enshrined in Article 22 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.
In simple terms, the signatories agree that society in which a person lives should help them to develop and to make the most of all the advantages (culture, work, social welfare) which are offered to them in the country. Social security may also refer to the action programs of government intended to promote the welfare of the population through assistance measures guaranteeing access to sufficient resources for food and shelter and to promote health and well-being for the population at large and potentially vulnerable segments such as children, the elderly, the sick and the unemployed. Services providing social security are often called social services Terminology in this area in the United States is somewhat different from in the rest of the English-speaking world. The general term for an action program in support of the wellbeing of the population in the United States is welfare program and the general term for all such programs is simply welfare. In American society, the term welfare arguably has negative connotations. The term Social Security, in the United States, refers to a specific social insurance program for the retired and the disabled. Elsewhere the term is used in a much broader sense, referring to the economic security society offers when people are faced with certain risks. In its 1952 Social Security Minimum Standards Convention  
The International labour Organization ILO defined the traditional contingencies covered by social security as including

·         Survival beyond a prescribed age, to be covered by old age pensions;
·         The loss of support suffered by a widow or child as the result of the death of the breadwinner survivor’s benefit
·         Responsibility for the maintenance of children family benefit
·         The treatment of any morbid condition including pregnancy, whatever its cause medical care
·         A suspension of earnings due to pregnancy and confinement and their consequences  maternity benefit
·         A suspension of earnings due to an inability to obtain suitable employment for protected persons who are capable of, and available for, work unemployment benefits
·         A suspension of earnings due to an incapacity for work resulting from a morbid condition sickness leave benefit
·         A permanent or persistent inability to engage in any gainful activity disability benefits
·         The costs and losses involved in medical care, sickness leave, invalidity and death of the breadwinner due to an occupational accident or disease employment injuries
·         People who cannot reach a guaranteed social minimum for other reasons may be eligible for social assistance or welfare, in American English.

Modern authors often consider the ILO approach too narrow. In their view, social security is not limited to the provision of cash transfers, but also aims at security of work, health, and social participation; and new social risks single parenthood, the reconciliation of work and family life should be included in the list as well.
Social security refer
Social insurance, where people receive benefits or services in recognition of contributions to an insurance program. These services typically include provision for retirement pensions, disability insurance, survivor benefits and unemployment insurance. Services   provided by government or designated agencies responsible for social security provision. In different countries, that may include medical care, financial support during unemployment, sickness, or retirement, health and safety at work, aspects of social work and even industrial relations. Basic security irrespective of participation in specific insurance programs where eligibility may otherwise be an issue. For instance, assistance given to newly arrived refugees for basic necessities such as food, clothing, housing, education, money, and medical care.
Link between social legislation and social security
Some of the acts enacted by the government of india to ensure social security are as follow:

Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI Act)
·         covers factories and establishments with 10 or more employees
·         Provides medical care to employees and their families.
·         Provides Cash benefits during sickness and maternity
·         Monthly pension after death or permanent disability.
Employees’ Provident Funds Act, 1952
·         Applies to specific scheduled factories and establishments employing 20 or more employees and ensures terminal benefits to provident fund, superannuation pension, and family pension in case of death during service.
Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 (WC Act)
·         Requires payment of compensation to the workman or his family in cases of employment related injuries resulting in death or disability.
Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 (M.B. Act)
·         Provides for 12 weeks wages during maternity as well as paid leave in certain other related contingencies.
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (P.G. Act)
·         Provides 15 days wages for each year of service to employees who have worked for five years or more in establishments having a minimum of 10 workers.


christian marriage act 1872

THE INDIAN CHRISTIAN MARRIAGE ACT 1872 INTRODUCTION Many Centuries ago, Christians came to India and settled in this country when East India Company assumed ruling power in India and established its own courts. With the establishment of the Supreme Courts, the Common Law of England was made applicable to India on many subjects including marriage and divorce among the Christian community, on the ground that it was based on the principle of equity, justice and good conscience. Before the enactment of Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 the law relating to solemnization in India of marriage of persons professing the Christian religion was guided by two British Acts, 14 and 15 Vict. C. 40 and 58 Geo. III C.84 and two Indian Acts, Acts 5 of 1852 and 5 of 1865. STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS The law relating to solemnization in India of marriages of persons professing the Christian religion is at present distributed over two English Acts of Parliament and three Acts of the Indian Legislature. The object of this Bill is to reduce into a smaller compass and simplify the existing law on this subject by the consolidation of the different enactments referred to, and at the same time, to amend the law in those matters in which it has been shown to be defective. For example, by Act V of 1865 it is provided that marriages between Native Christians shall be valid where the ages of the contracting parties are not less than sixteen and thirteen years respectively, and where they do not stand in relation to each other within the prohibited degrees of consanguinity or affinity. It has been very forcibly represented by the President and several Members of the Bengal Christian Association that this provision of the law works injuriously by freeing the children of Native Christian parents from the control which all other parents can legally exercise over their sons and daughters before the latter have attained their majority. The Bill requires the consent of the parents or guardians of Native Christian to a marriage between them, where the age of either of the parties about to contract such marriage is less than eighteen years, except in cases in which the minors have been altogether separated from their parents or natural guardians, and by reason of such separation are not proposed subject to their control. There is also some ambiguity in regard to the provisions of the law respecting the submission of returns, and the disposal of the records of the registration of marriages solemnized between Native Christians. The Bill lays down distinctly how such marriages are to be recorded in all cases. and provides for the disposal of the record. It also substitutes for the fixed rates of fees in respect of marriages solemnized by or before Marriage Registrars, a power to the Local Government to regulate such fees and their remission; and lastly, extends the Marriage Law to all places within the territories of Native Princes in alliance with Her Majesty, in respect of marriages between British subjects professing the Christian religion. ACT 15 OF 1872 The Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 (Act 15 of 1872), was enacted on 18th day of July, 1872 to consolidate and amend the law relation to the solemnization in India of the marriages of Christians. LIST OF AMENDING ACTS AND ADAPTATION ORDERS 1. The Repealing Act, 1874 (16 0f 1874) 2. The Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act, 1891 (2 of 1891) 3. The Indian Christian Marriage Act (1872), Amendment Act, 1891 (2 of 1891) 4. The Amending Act, 1891 (12 of 1891) 5. The Amending Act, 1903 (1 of 1903) 6. The Indian Christian Marriage (Amendment) Act, 1911 (13 of 1911) 7. The Devolution Act, 1920 (38 of 1920) 8. The Repealing and Amending Act, 1928 (18 of 1928) 9. The Government of India (Adaptation of Indian Laws) Order, 1937 10. The Repealing Act, 1938 (1 of 1938) 11. The Independence (Adaptation of Central Acts and Ordinances) Order, 1948 12. The Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950 13. The Part B States (Laws) Act, 1952(3 of 1951) 14. The Repealing and Amending Act, 1952 (48 of 1952) 15. The Union Territories (Laws) Act, 1950 (30 of 1950)as amended by Act 68 of1956 16. The adaptation of Laws (No. 2) Order, 1956 17. The Pondicherry (Extension of Laws) Act, 1968 (26 of 1968) 18. The Child Marriage Restraint (Amendment ) Act, 1983 (20 of 1983).
THE INDIAN CHRISTIAN MARRIAGE ACT 1872 INTRODUCTION Many Centuries ago, Christians came to India and settled in this country when East India Company assumed ruling power in India and established its own courts. With the establishment of the Supreme Courts, the Common Law of England was made applicable to India on many subjects including marriage and divorce among the Christian community, on the ground that it was based on the principle of equity, justice and good conscience. Before the enactment of Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 the law relating to solemnization in India of marriage of persons professing the Christian religion was guided by two British Acts, 14 and 15 Vict. C. 40 and 58 Geo. III C.84 and two Indian Acts, Acts 5 of 1852 and 5 of 1865. STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS The law relating to solemnization in India of marriages of persons professing the Christian religion is at present distributed over two English Acts of Parliament and three Acts of the Indian Legislature. The object of this Bill is to reduce into a smaller compass and simplify the existing law on this subject by the consolidation of the different enactments referred to, and at the same time, to amend the law in those matters in which it has been shown to be defective. For example, by Act V of 1865 it is provided that marriages between Native Christians shall be valid where the ages of the contracting parties are not less than sixteen and thirteen years respectively, and where they do not stand in relation to each other within the prohibited degrees of consanguinity or affinity. It has been very forcibly represented by the President and several Members of the Bengal Christian Association that this provision of the law works injuriously by freeing the children of Native Christian parents from the control which all other parents can legally exercise over their sons and daughters before the latter have attained their majority. The Bill requires the consent of the parents or guardians of Native Christian to a marriage between them, where the age of either of the parties about to contract such marriage is less than eighteen years, except in cases in which the minors have been altogether separated from their parents or natural guardians, and by reason of such separation are not proposed subject to their control. There is also some ambiguity in regard to the provisions of the law respecting the submission of returns, and the disposal of the records of the registration of marriages solemnized between Native Christians. The Bill lays down distinctly how such marriages are to be recorded in all cases. and provides for the disposal of the record. It also substitutes for the fixed rates of fees in respect of marriages solemnized by or before Marriage Registrars, a power to the Local Government to regulate such fees and their remission; and lastly, extends the Marriage Law to all places within the territories of Native Princes in alliance with Her Majesty, in respect of marriages between British subjects professing the Christian religion. ACT 15 OF 1872 The Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 (Act 15 of 1872), was enacted on 18th day of July, 1872 to consolidate and amend the law relation to the solemnization in India of the marriages of Christians. LIST OF AMENDING ACTS AND ADAPTATION ORDERS 1. The Repealing Act, 1874 (16 0f 1874) 2. The Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act, 1891 (2 of 1891) 3. The Indian Christian Marriage Act (1872), Amendment Act, 1891 (2 of 1891) 4. The Amending Act, 1891 (12 of 1891) 5. The Amending Act, 1903 (1 of 1903) 6. The Indian Christian Marriage (Amendment) Act, 1911 (13 of 1911) 7. The Devolution Act, 1920 (38 of 1920) 8. The Repealing and Amending Act, 1928 (18 of 1928) 9. The Government of India (Adaptation of Indian Laws) Order, 1937 10. The Repealing Act, 1938 (1 of 1938) 11. The Independence (Adaptation of Central Acts and Ordinances) Order, 1948 12. The Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950 13. The Part B States (Laws) Act, 1952(3 of 1951) 14. The Repealing and Amending Act, 1952 (48 of 1952) 15. The Union Territories (Laws) Act, 1950 (30 of 1950)as amended by Act 68 of1956 16. The adaptation of Laws (No. 2) Order, 1956 17. The Pondicherry (Extension of Laws) Act, 1968 (26 of 1968) 18. The Child Marriage Restraint (Amendment ) Act, 1983 (20 of 1983).
Part I - THE PERSONS BY WHOM MARRIAGES MAY BE SOLEMNIZED
4. Marriages to be solemnized according to Act — Every marriage between persons, one or both of whom is or are a Christian, or Christians, shall be solemnized in accordance with the provisions of the next following section; and any such marriage solemnized otherwise than in accordance with such provisions shall be void.
 The State Governments of the area have been authorised to grant and revoke the licences, granted in favour of certain persons, for the solemnization of marriages under the Act. As per the provisions contained in the Act, the marriage must be performed in a particular form duly entered in the Marriage Register, maintained for this purpose. The factum of marriage can be proved by producing the entries from this register. Other evidence can also be produced for this purpose. Version of the eye witnesses to the marriage, subsequent conduct of the couple living as husband and wife, can also be a good piece of evidence to prove the factum of a Christian marriage.2 Admission of either spouse is a relevant factor to prove the factum of marriage. A Christian Marriage can also take place at the house of the bride's mother and in that case the signing of Marriage Register is not essential under the Act.3 In a case before the Karnataka High Court reported in (1993 MLJ 31), it was held, "Christian marriage even if one of its parties in a Hindu can not be dissolved by a decree of divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act." However, a Division Bench of the same High Court in its decision reported in (1995 MLJ 492), held that a marriage performed under the Christian Marriage Act and validly registered under the provisions of Special Marriage Act can be dissolved on the basis of mutual consent under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act if the conditions laid down in that Section are fulfilled. 5. Persons by whom marriages may be solemnized — Marriages may be solemnized in India— (1) by any person who has received episcopal ordination, provided that the marriage be solemnized according to the rules, rites, ceremonies and customs of the Church of which he is a Minister; (2) by any Clergyman of the Church of Scotland, provided that such marriage be solemnized according to the rules, rites, ceremonies and customs of the Church of Scotland; (3) by any Minister of Religion licensed under this Act to solemnize marriages; (4) by, or in the presence of, a Marriage Registrar appointed under this Act; (5) by any person licensed under this Act to grant certificates of marriage between Indian Christians. COMMENTS As a general rule every marriage under this Act shall be solemnised between the hours of six in the morning and seven in the evening and the place of marriage is a Church. Exceptions are, however, made in case where a special licence permitting a clergyman of the Church is granted. The Act of a person who solemnises a marriage beyond these hours and outside the Church in the absence of the witnesses without any special licence, has been made punishable under section 69 of the Act. The punishment provided is upto three years imprisonment. 6. Grant and revocation of licenses to solemnize marriages — The State Government, so far as regards the territories under its administration, may, by notification in the Official Gazette, grant licences to Ministers of Religion to solemnize marriages within such territories and may, by a like notification, revoke such licences. 7. Marriage Registrars.— The State Government may appoint one or more Christians, either by name or as holding any office for the time being, to be the Marriage Registrar or Marriage Registrars for any district subject to its administration. Senior Marriage Registrar Where there are more Marriage Registrars than one in any district, the State Government shall appoint one of them to be the Senior Marriage Registrar. Magistrate when to be Marriage Registrar When there is only one Marriage Registrar in a district, and such Registrar is absent from such district, or ill, or when his office is temporarily vacant, the Magistrate of district shall act as, and be, Marriage Registrar thereof during such absence, illness, or temporary vacancy.

SCHEDULE I (See sections 12 and 38) NOTICE OF MARRIAGE To a Minister [or Registrar or I hereby give you notice that a marriage is intended to be had, within three calendar months from the date hereof, between me and the other party herein named and described (that is to say):— Names Condition Rank or Age Dwelling Length of Church, chapel District in profession place residence or place of which the worship in other party which the resides, marriage is to when the be solemnized parties dwell in different districts James Widower Carpenter Of 16, Clive 23 days Smith full age Street Free Church ——————————————————————————————————————————— ——— of Scotland Martha Spinster ——— Minor 20, Has- More than Church, Green tings a month Calcutta Street Witness my hand, this..................day of........seventy two. (Signed) JAMES SMITH [The Italics in this schedule are to be filled up, as the case may be, and the blank division thereof is only to be filled up when one of the parties lives in another district. SCHEDULE II (See sections 24 and 50) CERTIFICATE OF RECEIPT OF NOTICE I,..........do hereby certify that, on the day of,.........notice was duly entered in my Marriage Notice Book of the marriage in attended between the parties therein named and described, delivered under the hand of...., one of the parties (that is to say):— Names Condition Rank or Age Dwelling Length of Church, chapel District in profession place residence or place of which the worship in other party which the resides, marriage is to when the be solemnized parties dwell in different districts James Widower Carpenter Of 16, Clive 23 days Smith full age Street Free Church ——————————————————————————————————————————— ——— of Scotland Martha Spinster ——— Minor 20, Has- More than Church, Green tings a month Calcutta Street and that the declaration, or oath required by section 17 or 41 of the Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872, has been duly made by the said (James Smith). Date of notice entered The issue of this certificate has not been prohibited by any person authorized to forbid the Date of Certificate given issue thereof. Witness my hand, this................day of.................seventy-two (Signed) This certificate will be void, unless the marriage is solemnized on or before the........day of........ [The italics in the schedule are to be filled up, as the case may be, and the blank division thereof only to be filled up when one of the parties lives in another district. SCHEDULE III (See sections 28 and 31) FORM OF REGISTER OF MARRIAGES Quarterly Returns of Marriages for The Archdeaconry of Calcutta, Madras, Bombay, I........................, Registrar of the Archdeaconry of Calcutta, Madras, do hereby Bombay, certify that the annexed are correct copies of the originals and Official Quarterly Returns of Marriage within the Archdeaconry of Calcutta, as made and transmitted to me for the quarter Madras, Bombay, commencing the...........day of.........ending the.....day of.....in the year of Our Lord........ Signature of Registrar) Registrar of the Archdeaconry of Calcutta, Madras, Bombay, Allahabad, Barrackpore, MARRIAGES solemnized at Bareilly, Calcutta, etc. etc. WHEN MARRIED NAME OF PARTIES Condition —————————————————————————————————————— ——————— Age Year Month Day Christian Surname Rank or Residence Father's By banns Signature Signature Signature profession at the time name and of license of the of two or of the person of marriage surname parties more solemnizing witnesses the marriage present SCHEDULE IV (See sections 32 and 54) MARRIAGE REGISTER BOOK Num- When married Name of parties Age Condi Rank Resi- Father's ber ————————————— tion or prof dence name Chris- Sur- fession at the and tian name time of surname name marriage Day Month Year James White 26 Wido- Car- Agra William years wer penter White Martha Duncan 17 Spins- — Agra John years ter Duncan Married in the...... This marriage was James White John Smith solemnized between us in the presence of Marth Duncan, John Green, CERTIFICATE OF MARRIAGE Num- When married Name of parties Age Condi Rank Resi- Father's ber ————————————— tion or prof dence name Chris- Sur- fession at the and tian name time of surname name marriage Day Month Year James White 26 Wido- Car- Agra William years wer penter White Martha Duncan 17 Spins- — Agra John years ter Duncan Married in the...... This marriage was James White John Smith solemnized between us in the presence of Marth Duncan, John Green, SCHEDULE V Enactments Repealed. Rep. by the Repealing Act, 1938 (1 of 1938), Sec. 2 and Sch. Pt. I

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000

 The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 is the primary legal framework for juvenile justice in India. The act provides for a special approach towards the prevention and treatment of juvenile delinquency and provides a framework for the protection, treatment and rehabilitation of children in the purview of the juvenile justice system. This law, brought in compliance of the 1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), repealed the earlier Juvenile Justice Act of 1986 after India signed and ratified the UNCRC in 1992. This act has been further amended in 2006 and 2010. In the wake of Delhi gang rape (16 Dec 2012), the law suffered a nationwide criticism owing to its helplessness against crimes where juveniles get involved in heinous crimes like rape and murder. In 2015, responding to the public sentiment, both the houses of parliament in India further amended the bill that lowered the juvenile age to 16 and proposed adult-like treatment for juveniles accused of heinous crimes. The lower house, i.e. Lok Sabha passed the bill on 7 May 2015 and the upper house,i.e. Rajya Sabha on 22 December 2015. The bill was approved by President Pranab Mukherjee's assent on 31 December 2015.
The Act is considered to be extremely progressive legislation and the Model Rules 2007 have further added to the effectiveness of this welfare legislation. However, the implementation is a very serious concern even in 2013 and the Supreme Court of India is constantly looking into the implementation of this law in Sampurna Behrua Versus Union of India and Bachpan Bachao AndolanVersus Union of India. In addition to the Supreme Court, the Bombay and Allahabad High Courts are also monitoring implementation of the Act in judicial proceedings. In order to upgrade the Juvenile Justice Administration System, the Government of India launched the Integrated Child Protection Scheme (ICPS) in 2009-10 whereby financial allocations have been increased and various existing schemes have been merged under one scheme.
A separate petition titled Deepika Thusso Versus State of Jammu and Kashmir is also pending consideration before the Supreme Court on implementation of the Juvenile Justice Act, 1997 which is applicable in the State of Jammu and Kashmir.
Based on a resolution passed in 2006 and reiterated in 2009 in the Conference of Chief Justices of India, several High Courts have constituted "Juvenile Justice Committees" headed by sitting judges of High Courts. These committees supervise and monitor implementation of the Act in their jurisdiction.

The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 is a United States federal law providing funds to states that follow a series of federal protections, known as the "core protections," on the care and treatment of youth in the justice system. The four "core protections" of the act are:
  • Deinstitutionalization of Status Offenders (DSO) -- the deinstitutionalization of status offenders and non-offenders requires that youth who are runaways, truants or curfew violators cannot be detained in juvenile detention facilities or adult jails;
  • "Sight and Sound"—The "Sight and Sound" separation protection disallows contact between juvenile and adult offenders (i.e. if juveniles are put in an adult jail or lock up under the limited circumstances the law allows for, they must be separated from adult inmates);
  • "Jail Removal"—The "Jail Removal" disallows the placement of youth in adult jails and lock ups except under very limited circumstances;
  • Disproportionate Minority Confinement (DMC) -- The DMC provision requires states to address the issue of over-representation of youth of color in the justice system.
The "DSO" and "Sight and Sound" protections were part of the original law in 1974. The "Jail Removal" provision was added in 1980 in response to finding youth incarcerated in adult facilities resulted in "a high suicide rate, physical, mental, and sexual assault, inadequate care and programming, negative labeling, and exposure to serious offenders and mental patients." The "DMC" requirement was added in the JJDPA in 1992. 
The compliance of states towards the requirements of the JJDP Act is monitored by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
As of 2000, the "vast majority" of participating states comply with the first three requirements and are making strides towards the fourth.With the exception of Wyoming, all states participate in the program.

THE JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION ACT OF 1974 
Prior Federal Juvenile Delinquency Activity 
1912 Children’s Bureau created by Act of Congress. The Act directed the Bureau “to investigate and report...on all matters pertaining to the welfare of children and child life among all classes of our people and shall especially investigate the questions of infant mortality, the birth rate, orphanage, juvenile courts, desertion, dangerous occupations, accidents, and diseases of children, employment, legislation affecting children in the several States and Territories.” 
1948 Interdepartmental Committee on Children and Youth established. Its purpose was to develop closer relationships among Federal Agencies concerned with children and youth. 
1950 The Midcentury White House Conference on Children and Youth met in Washington, D.C. The conference considered methods to strengthen juvenile courts, development of juvenile police services, and studied prevention and treatment services of social agencies, police, courts, institutions, and after-care agencies. 
1961 President’s Committee on Juvenile Delinquency and Youth Crime established. It recommended enactment of the Juvenile Delinquency and Youth Offenses Control Act of 1961. 
1961 Juvenile Delinquency and Youth Offenses Control Act of 1961 enacted. It had a three year authorization for the purpose of demonstrating new methods of delinquency prevention and control. 
1964 Juvenile Delinquency and Youth Offenses Control Act extended to carry out a special demonstration project in Washington, D.C. The Act was subsequently extended through fiscal year 1967. 
1968 Juvenile Delinquency Prevention and Control Act of 1968 enacted. This act assigned to HEW responsibility for developing a national approach to the problem of Juvenile Delinquency. States were to prepare and implement comprehensive juvenile delinquency plans and, upon approval, receive Federal funds to carry out prevention, rehabilitation, training, and research programs. 
1968 Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 enacted. This Act provided block grants to States in order to improve and strengthen law enforcement. While not specifically mentioning juvenile delinquency, this Act’s broad crime control and prevention mandate authorized funding of delinquency control and prevention programs. 
1971 Juvenile Delinquency Prevention and Control Act extended for one year. The Interdepartmental Council to Coordinate all Federal Juvenile Delinquency Programs was established by this Act. 2 
1971 Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act amended. The definition of law enforcement was amended to specifically include programs related to prevention, control, and reduction of juvenile delinquency. Grants were authorized for community-based juvenile delinquency prevention programming and correctional programs. 
1972 Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Act enacted. This Act was an extension of the Juvenile Delinquency Prevention and Control Act of 1971. Under the Act, HEW was to fund preventive programs outside the juvenile justice system. Efforts to combat delinquency within the juvenile justice system were to be assisted through the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act by the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration. 
1973 Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act amended. The Act now specifically required that there be a juvenile delinquency component to the comprehensive State plan for the improvement of law enforcement and criminal justice. 
1974 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 enacted. This Act provided, for the first time, a unified national program to deal with juvenile delinquency prevention and control within the context of the total law enforcement and criminal justice effort. 
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act-- Major Provisions/Amendments 1974 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act 1. Replaced Juvenile Delinquency Prevention and Control Act of 1968. 
2. Authorized for 3 years with budget authority of $350 million. 
3. Provided for discretionary and block grants. 
4. Created an Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention within LEAA, with the Runaway Youth Program (Title III) to be administered by HEW. 
5. Created a National Advisory Committee, a Federal Coordinating Council, a National Institute for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; provided formula grants to States based on population under 18; and provided discretionary funds to support youth programs developed by public and private youth serving agencies. 
6. Mandated that States participating in Act: 3 - Remove status offenders within 2 years of enactment from secure detention and correctional facilities; - Not place juveniles in any institutions where they would have regular contact with adults convicted of criminal charges.